Comments on: Roger Stone: Rothstein Broke State Election Laws

By: see your point and raise you

see your point and raise you — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:33:55 +0000

But he is a lobbyist, alternatively a lawyer that does government related law, and I do not want either on the County Commission. Nothing good can come from that mix.

I see your point and raise you one:
And nothing good can come from a lawyer whose mother is a dirty lobbyist, I do not want either in the state! No one wants any of that mix. Which is why It WILL NOT happen. Come say the entire district 91 commmunity.

By: I am Here's The Point

I am Here's The Point — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:17:27 +0000

I am here’s the point and I am voting for Sue Gunzburger. Let’s get that very clear.

I am thankful to Steve Geller for the good he has done in our community.

But he is a lobbyist, alternatively a lawyer that does government related law, and I do not want either on the County Commission. Nothing good can come from that mix.

By: really stoner?

really stoner? — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:00:57 +0000

Stoner:

I just want to make sure I understand your view.

If someone is complaining about the negative campaigning, that’s Geller’s campaign. If someone is using negative campaigning, that’s Gunzberger’s campaign.

OK, sounds right.

By: Stoner

Stoner — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:28:44 +0000

“Here’s The Point” sounds an awful lot like the “we’re pathetic” whining of lobbyist Steve Geller and his do-boy David Brown.

By: I. P. Auphen

I. P. Auphen — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:49:27 +0000

Question to Buddy:
I have always wondered why in the world of politics, when one wishes to demean a person whom they disagree or dislike they put a “y” after their name?
When them Dems began to hate Ronald Reagan, he became “Ronny”. George Bush became “Georgey” and now Scott
Rothstein has become “Scotty”.
Is there some political history or perhaps psychological infirmity attached to this behavior?
Just wondering.

FROM BUDDY: Why would anybody believe there is something wrong with having a “y” at the end of his name?

By: Here's The Point

Here's The Point — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:05:08 +0000

While all these insider titans play around with their millions trying to get this one or that one elected so that they can reap the advantages of same, ads that they authorize during campaigns are playing in the homes of everday citizens trying to figure out how to vote.

They hear those ads and they respond to them. It affects how the masses vote. Much of what is said on the ads is not true. It is spin generated by money contributed by those who have a business and personal stake in who wins the election.

That friends is not democracy. That is some other form of government that is not represented by a flag with stars or stripes on it.

It is time to flush all this kind of stuff out of Broward County. We the people can make Broward clean again. All we have to do is force these people to stop lying, stop stealing, stop trying to manipulate us, to vote against any candidate that is using negative campaigning.

Negative campaign ads? Vote against those candidates always. Period.

Only vote for the people who run on their records. Vote for the one that you think has the best record. Do not be manipulated like a puppet and take your community back from devils like Roger Stone who has made a living out of lies and manipulation.

By: Gev Ballagher

Gev Ballagher — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:04:59 +0000

Just as a reminder to everyone, it is alleged I only took $13,000 (and had a nice holiday party cruise with another SB member (Hope … dont you guys remember her and why are you alwasy picking on me when there are others to pick on?)). Anyway, it wasn’t really “money” since it belonged to the Feds. I mean, it isn’t like anyone is really out any money. So, see … compared to Rothstein allegations, I should get time served or maybe the government can dismiss my case and focus on other people. That would save them more than the $13,000 they say I took.

By: Stone's Mother

Stone's Mother — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:21:45 +0000

Rothstein disappoints…I thought he as a loyal REPUBLICAN

Rothstein is the one who ASKED Stone to save “Mr. Exciting” Al Lamberti. Stone laid out a strategy of unmasking Israel for the racist scum he is . Stone worked closely with Rich heffley, another GOP hatchetman to SWING 350,000 votes from Obama to Lamberti= and STONE and Heffely won. Stone did it gratis for Rothstein. Heffely made $100,000.

THEN- in the closing days Rothstein funnels illegal contribs to ISRAEl who promises rothstein the BSO labor legal work.

Stone does his MAGIC and……Scotty sells him out.

LAMBERTI KICKS ASS ON ELECTION DAY

The Rothstein demanded the legal work from lamberti who declined to take the $1M contract from the Miami firm that has it now,

Funny Scott use to say MOE was a rat…but now who’s ratting.

$3000 is a lot to get your name out of a “file” even with DB on the inside.

By: broward lawyer

broward lawyer — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:23:09 +0000

RRA/Scott Rothstein isn’t the only law firm in town to do that. Several very prominent law firms did that all the time back in the day. Probably still are.

By: I. P. Auphen

I. P. Auphen — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:32:27 +0000

I have only met Roger Stone on a couple of occasions.
He is definitley one of the most interesting people that I have come across.
Someone above talked about him lying. Please point out the dates and times that he has lied so that we all may know. As far as Scott Israel went, Stone covered himself. He got and affidavit to support the claim of theft by Israel.
As an aside, if I had to chose anyone in the downtown crowd to have my back in a street fight, it would be Stone hands down.
I see a different person. Stone is a man of his word.