Comments on: Does Rothstein’s Lawyer Have A Conflict?

By: j

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:37:00 +0000

Thats because he was living for free in a Rothstein house PR DISATER and sipping whskey on a monday is indicative of how many clients the moron has

By: PR Disaster

PR Disaster — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:08:40 +0000

Nurik has made some amazing PR mistakes. He allowed his client to be interviewed by The Miami Herald and boast about how he was enjoying expensive cigars poolside. Then he allowed him to be photographed drinking a martini at a restaurant which showed up on Channel 10. And he allowed Rothstein to be interviewed on Channel 7.

By: Lady Law

Lady Law — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:51:51 +0000

The answer to the question is most definitely.

By: John

John — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:40:04 +0000

As a partner who observed Scott and saw the daily workings of the firm, he is a potential witness in any civil or criminal matters.

This is so clear it’s crazy he would even consider representing him.

Worse, Nurik, as a lawyer and potential civil defendant, could advise his client to hold back information to the FBI that would be damaging to him.

Of course it’s a conflict.

By: Scotty's Flunky

Scotty's Flunky — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:16:19 +0000

Les Stracher was Rothstein’s lock-stock and barrel. Watch him.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:01:35 +0000

Nurik is a schlep lawyer and not well thought of by the DOJ. He’s trying to use his representation of Mr. BIG as a means to deflect his vicarious involvement.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:01 +0000

Now that Scotty has gone public on TV,
he is sending a message: If my former partners are trying to throw me under the bus, I am going to STEAMROLL them. Idiot lawyer Kendall Coffey’s “show and tell” office tour has backfired Scotty reveals that was only the way the law firm operated in the last seven months. How about the other six years? This is going to get UGLY.

By: Florida's Bar

Florida's Bar — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:12 +0000

Nurik is not the only one with a conflict. Les Stracher’s client was Ed Morse & I’ve read Ed Morse lost millions. David Boden wasn’t even authorized to practice law in Florida. Grant Smith was the “managing partner.” Stuart Rosenfedlt is a moron bought off with cars and money. Carlos Reyes. Barry Stone. All part of it.

By: Karnack and Scorekeeper

Karnack and Scorekeeper — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:59:40 +0000

Buddy,

There are many conflicts to go around. The entire firm has to answer to questions about where they and their ethics were while this whole scheme unfolded.

Buddy, if you opened a business with a friend and that friend began spending ‘your’ future bonus or basic income, even if you were not responsible for the books or the management of the company, you would surely ask questions. You would be “in the know” even if you were not pleased about what you knew.

The very idea that the other attorneys were simply unaware of the fraud being perpetrated simply does not hold water.

I feel that before this is over, the majority of the firm will be implicated in some manor. The plausible deniability defense may work with Satz…but not the Feds.

By: Chaz Stevens

Chaz Stevens — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:44:06 +0000

Queen for a day? Ha!

If SR spends anytime getting pokied while in the pokey, he’ll be queen for a lot longer than a day.