<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commission Votes Insider Moskowitz More Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Baerenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/comment-page-1/#comment-16037</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Baerenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browardbeat.com/?p=794#comment-16037</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with paying someone what they are asking for when they get the job done and are worth the cost.  My interest is this, in a time when the County Commission is terrorizing everyone about money, they added an additional 30% to an existing contract.  Now, did Esq. Moskowitz come to the commission and ask for more?  Was this necessary to complete his (their) work?  Did the Commission take this upon themselves as some sort of &quot;good faith&quot; measure?  Here at the working man&#039;s level, if I agree to do something for someone for a set ammount, whether I give them a deal or not and whether I make money or lose money, I stick to the terms of my agreement, verbal, written or otherwise.  So in this time of cutbacks, how did this play out?  I am not questioning Esq. Moskowitz, I am questioning our County Commission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with paying someone what they are asking for when they get the job done and are worth the cost.  My interest is this, in a time when the County Commission is terrorizing everyone about money, they added an additional 30% to an existing contract.  Now, did Esq. Moskowitz come to the commission and ask for more?  Was this necessary to complete his (their) work?  Did the Commission take this upon themselves as some sort of &#8220;good faith&#8221; measure?  Here at the working man&#8217;s level, if I agree to do something for someone for a set ammount, whether I give them a deal or not and whether I make money or lose money, I stick to the terms of my agreement, verbal, written or otherwise.  So in this time of cutbacks, how did this play out?  I am not questioning Esq. Moskowitz, I am questioning our County Commission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Define REAL Talent</title>
		<link>http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/comment-page-1/#comment-15973</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Define REAL Talent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browardbeat.com/?p=794#comment-15973</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s say you&#039;re a county commissioner and you have a problem in the government that requires the services of a good lawyer with an excellent track record for performance.  You can select anyone you want because that&#039;s how it should be with legal services.  But let&#039;s even say that you&#039;re looking at two very talented people to choose from. Let&#039;s go further and say they are equally talented.  

Both have excellent credentials and track records.

One also has decades of involvement in the local political process and so he understands government, the players, special insights about the environment around which he has to work.  He&#039;s built up a reputation over many years for being trusted among elected leaders.  He also has decades of involvement in the community, serving on non-profit boards, doing countless hours of pro-bono work, raising millions for charities, serving as a party delegate, that kind of thing.  All in addition to being a great lawyer.  Got the picture?

The other guy is also a good lawyer but after work he mostly goes home, jumps in his pool, and then goes out to dinner.  Not much of a community profile but a good lawyer nonetheless. 

Who do you pick?

End of discussion.  

PS -- And pardon the suggestion, but there&#039;s not a GD thing wrong about that. Everthing else said here is sour grapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a county commissioner and you have a problem in the government that requires the services of a good lawyer with an excellent track record for performance.  You can select anyone you want because that&#8217;s how it should be with legal services.  But let&#8217;s even say that you&#8217;re looking at two very talented people to choose from. Let&#8217;s go further and say they are equally talented.  </p>
<p>Both have excellent credentials and track records.</p>
<p>One also has decades of involvement in the local political process and so he understands government, the players, special insights about the environment around which he has to work.  He&#8217;s built up a reputation over many years for being trusted among elected leaders.  He also has decades of involvement in the community, serving on non-profit boards, doing countless hours of pro-bono work, raising millions for charities, serving as a party delegate, that kind of thing.  All in addition to being a great lawyer.  Got the picture?</p>
<p>The other guy is also a good lawyer but after work he mostly goes home, jumps in his pool, and then goes out to dinner.  Not much of a community profile but a good lawyer nonetheless. </p>
<p>Who do you pick?</p>
<p>End of discussion.  </p>
<p>PS &#8212; And pardon the suggestion, but there&#8217;s not a GD thing wrong about that. Everthing else said here is sour grapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Had The Inside Track</title>
		<link>http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/comment-page-1/#comment-15832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Had The Inside Track</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browardbeat.com/?p=794#comment-15832</guid>
		<description>&quot;Others can&#039;t or won.&quot;  How do you know, Worth Every Penny?  The commission only considered using Moskowitz.  When you hold fund raisers for the right commissioners, you get the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Others can&#8217;t or won.&#8221;  How do you know, Worth Every Penny?  The commission only considered using Moskowitz.  When you hold fund raisers for the right commissioners, you get the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worth Every Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.browardbeat.com/commission-votes-insider-moskowitz-more-money/comment-page-1/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>Worth Every Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browardbeat.com/?p=794#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>Everybody knows.  Mike gets the job done when others can&#039;t or won&#039;t.  That makes him worth every penny.  Let others disagree by pointing to facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows.  Mike gets the job done when others can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t.  That makes him worth every penny.  Let others disagree by pointing to facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

