Comments on: Alu: We Need A New Courthouse

By: Absconder

Absconder — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:43:22 +0000

Well you want to talk about jobs for artists to the tune of $610,000 in the NEW* courthouse; well, what about spending that money on exterminators who could use some business getting rid of the rats. I mean real rats not the two legged kind. We can vote them out! Or can we? We voted against a NEW* courthouse and we’re still getting that jammed down our throats, aren’t we?

By: Rick Aron

Rick Aron — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:09:15 +0000

The voter already spoke when the voted against the new court house. To go around the publics backs is a slap in the face to every american and what this country is suposed to stand for.

By: alert

alert — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:34:43 +0000

what setd me off is your selfish ignorance,cut the Sheriffs budget 50%,give out furlough days to hard working middle class workers,cut the parks and recreation days,close the libararies,screw frist responders.But we will vote in a 328 million dollar courthouse after the public told us to take a hike,so we will go in the backdoor tell the public to shove it because you elitus think that the public is uneducated.
The only underlying issues is that you stuck it to the public and you couldnt care less that you did it.
it is a pitythat the county employees will get a fourlough day on feb 15,enjoy your lobbyist courthouse

By: Franklin Roosevelt

Franklin Roosevelt — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:25:10 +0000

sure it helps there newspapers get access to court info,if they make nice

By: Winston Churchill

Winston Churchill — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:12:46 +0000

Sheila rules. even the Sun Sentinel and Miami Herald editorial pages agree with her.

By: Hardly Alert

Hardly Alert — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:01:22 +0000

Alert: I dont insult your spelling and grammer — I raised only because you choose the term uneducated to go after anyone who disagrees with you (despite your refusal to admit that you have done nothing to research the underlying issue). It is unusual to have on Buddy’s blog the swill from the usual Sun-Sentinel commenting crowd. Go back over there and spew your venom at the world and government and taxes and whatever else sets you off.

By: alert

alert — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:19:08 +0000

apparently you are with the typical non sense,for 328 million that you ramroded to the taxpayers these uneducated ,uninformed fools have to start bring up discrimination,race cards and everthing else,including the kitchen sink,to attempt to justify spending 328 million dollars,no sometime a leader has to rip off the taxpapers and you are right just because they decided to rip us off the public doesnt mean they are leading correctly,yes we will disagree the taxpapers are discriminated against,we asked you ,we said no,we freight the bill,come back with a proposal state your case,and let the taxpapers decided instead of all your mouth breathing nonsense.if you state your case to the public and explain your actions I am sure they would vote in your favor rather then the last time you put it on the ballot and did nothing.
You could insult my grammer or spelling,but you wont stop my voice from an elitus like your self.
it is apparent the court house crowd is afraid of the publio

By: Vinnie Grande AKA "Gonzo"

Vinnie Grande AKA "Gonzo" — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:45:45 +0000

Hey Vinnie Grande AKA “Gonzo”

Why don’t you tell the good people on this blog why you hate Alu so much? Tick Tock Tick Tock… must be horrible waiting for that 6 AM knock at the door.

By: Hardly Alert

Hardly Alert — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:59:57 +0000

Alert: I get it. You are anti-lawyer, anti-courthouse (cuz you werent treated nicely) and anti-spelling/grammer check.

Sometimes, a leader has to lead. People wanted to keep the apparatus of racial discrimination in place, and some leaders said they would lead on the issue.

People were against desegregation of schools, and some leaders said they would lead on the issue.

The fact the people reacted negatively does not mean they reacted correctly.

You may be right about the cost number (and if you and I ever agree on anything, it will be that we had better watch the self-dealing and cost overruns like hawks). But you again lose the force of your arguments when you liken the conditions in the courthouse to a few sniffles. You have not taken ANY time to educate yourself on the issue.

So, we need the new courthouse. We can argue about costs and the extent of what is necessary, but there is no question is needed. Just like good leadership is needed.

By: alert

alert — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:15:07 +0000

the only thing that is a disaster is the rip off the citzens of this county.This is so typical we need 328 million in this rip off,because we have sniffles,but it is okay to cut the frist responders but by 50 % ,people who scrafice there lives,I did sit on jury duty twice and the only thing I could tell you is that I handed in my slip ,she nastily told me to sit down and wait for my number to be called,while siting their a judge who will be nameless went through the motions and left.
Once again your lack of intelligehnce is pathetic,frist i did not say I was against the courthouse,I said your hyporite buddies went to the public they were turned down,they should have to go back to the public if the piblic approves so be it.
What do you care that you spend 328 million dollars with a high unemployment rate.The only dangerous one is you,and it shows how little you care,just rip off the public,spending 328 million without public arrival after you went to the public once before,now thatis dangerous.great work ace